Post Your Ideas or Suggestions for our RP Servers Here!
User avatar
By Aren
#166668
No. If you have “20+ members” and can’t fit everything in your base whichever is 4x4x3 sounds like you need to clean your roster and not accept everyone with a pulse.
NeedlessMemeing liked this
User avatar
By Helena
#166681
No. If you have “20+ members” and can’t fit everything in your base whichever is 4x4x3 sounds like you need to clean your roster and not accept everyone with a pulse.
I don't think "accept everyone with a pulse" is the case for BMC, when they have had over 120 people apply for the group and currently the group only 20-25 members in it. Of course the group still has a big amount of players but is fairly small compared to the amount of people that have attempted to be part of the group.
Regardless of this, a modification to the rule in general seems fair and useful as Outspace mentioned each member has to resource to having a personal base:
Imagine 20+ people building a base, If every member of the group made a 1x1, ofc this would fit within a 4x4x3 but obviously not everyone is going to limit themselves to making a 1x1x1. An example of this is how one of the BMC members owned the Mall at the same time someone else owned the hospital and at the same time other 4 members owned 1x1x3, T shaped, 2x1x2, bases around this exact zone that caused lag. With that being said, if it was allowed for a group to have at least 2 group bases it would be a very big support to keep the server clean from lag.
Burnt, WyattL liked this
User avatar
By Aren
#166742
No. If you have “20+ members” and can’t fit everything in your base whichever is 4x4x3 sounds like you need to clean your roster and not accept everyone with a pulse.
I don't think "accept everyone with a pulse" is the case for BMC, when they have had over 120 people apply for the group and currently the group only 20-25 members in it. Of course the group still has a big amount of players but is fairly small compared to the amount of people that have attempted to be part of the group.
Regardless of this, a modification to the rule in general seems fair and useful as Outspace mentioned each member has to resource to having a personal base:
Imagine 20+ people building a base, If every member of the group made a 1x1, ofc this would fit within a 4x4x3 but obviously not everyone is going to limit themselves to making a 1x1x1. An example of this is how one of the BMC members owned the Mall at the same time someone else owned the hospital and at the same time other 4 members owned 1x1x3, T shaped, 2x1x2, bases around this exact zone that caused lag. With that being said, if it was allowed for a group to have at least 2 group bases it would be a very big support to keep the server clean from lag.

Let's look at it like this... Shall we?

24 players can fit in a server, this group has "20-25 players" So by this standard they can fit an entire server of just them plus some. That seems relatively "anyone will a pulse" if they can flood once server and cap it from having others join.

You should of cut off registration at the point where more than 3/4th of the player count can be just one group. At that point it is not trying to be a "group" but more of a player capped group.


There will be no addition to bases with groups who have "large" number of players.

I am also going to nitpick at your "120 people applying". The first post by burnt is 118 replies, each one with an app and then a declined / accepted 59 posts. Now we have to account for off topic posts / double posts so that would be around half of that as well roughly 30 posts? Now Yoshis.... 61. So 30 posts with an acceptance declining. Accounting for off topic 15?

45 accumulated people have applied.


Locked and idea declined. Find other ways to store your loot/empty spaced bases in other ways.
Matty, Sp4x liked this

GET ACCESS TO CUSTOM KITS & COMMANDS!